Supervision and developing the profession: One supervision or many?

Social Work Research in New Zealand

Liz Beddoe

Supervision is “not politically innocent”

Adamson here suggests that in making the arguments ‘for’ supervision we must be very mindful of the context (Adamson 2012, 194). Supervision is not, and should never be presumed to be, politically neutral. Regulation of social work has tended to embed traditional practices of supervision into social work professional systems. Questions arise about the impact of culture (in its broadest sense), systems of education and organisational (regulatory, employment and professional) systems on the practice of supervision as it accompanies models of social work professionalism around the globe.

In its purest form it might be hoped that supervision could transcend its ‘local’ contexts and promote social work principles, theories and skills.

In contemporary social work however supervision is often legitimated via professional and organisational systems (regulation and management) which may challenge traditional discourses of professionalism and professional autonomy and discretion (Evetts 2011)…

View original post 89 more words

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s